Wiki Collaboration has permeated virtually to all forms of on-line collaboration and social media. It was a seed concept which was invented and developed in 1994, came to be used so widely today. The best example of Wiki collaboration, the Wikipedia, is the most referenced online content repository in the world.
Talking about Wiki collaboration, James wales, the co-founder of Wikipedia has recently announced that he will be starting a new publication called the ‘Wikitribune’ to cover fake news. James says, ‘Wiki tribune’ would be a ‘news site with a sense of community’ with ‘Evidence-based journalism’ on the underline.
Wikitribune will bring together the public and the journalists on the same plane. Wikitribune will project facts as it is and news content will be taken out of bias. It will be unrestricted for all with a genuine sense of community. Commendable.
I am not going to talk about what ails Wikipedia or the rise and decline of Wikipedia. There has been a number of articles written on the decline. I feel that there is a lot to learn from Wikipedia. Now with the announcement of the Wikitribune, my sincere hunch is that it would reverse the trend for the better.
Vannevar Bush the celebrated engineer, inventor and administrator must be one happy man in his grave. He left a legacy and passed away. His invention of the Memex in the 1930’s, led to the development of the internet as we know today. The memex also led to the development of the Wiki collaboration software.
Please read our blog article “The global brain and graph theory”.
It was in 1994, Bird cunningham the inventor of Wiki software, was inspired by Vannvar’s ideas on Memex and further developed it into a software where people can share and collaboratively edit documents. His desire was that people can collaboratively contribute and talks about their experiences by adding and editing content without much technical know-how on computers.
There are thousands of active wikis in use around the world. They are used as team collaboration software, knowledge management tools, corporate intranets and community forum websites.
You can read more on ‘Wiki collaboration’ on this Wikipedia reference site.
What is a wiki?
A wiki is an online software that lets you share and collaboratively modify and edit contents and documents with others using a simple web browser.
Did you know: Wiki is a Hawaiian name, which means ‘Quick’.
Wikipedia: the best know Wiki collaboration software
I was amazed to know that about 10 billion people visit the Wikipedia in a month for the English version alone. No wonder it is the 6th most widely read magazine in the world.
An article from MIT technology review from Tim simonite was a thought to provoke. Though the article was written in 2013, the title of the article ” The decline of Wikipedia’ caught my attention’. You can find the article here.
I saw some valid points. Apart from that I have not seen much written about it in the recent years. There is one from Andrew Lih titled ” Can Wikipedia survive” published in the Newyork times. You can find the article here.
A lot to learn from Wikipedia
I came to know that there were a lot of improvements that Wikipedia was working on, ground up. Surely, there must have been a lot of challenges that Wikipedia as a Wiki collaboration software would have faced over the years.
How did Wikipedia face them and what were those? What are lessons that we can learn from its journey?
are the few questions that came up to me.
There is a social instinct in all of is to collaborate and contribute content. We do it for the greater good. Wiki collaboration needs a good dose of altruism. On this take, Wikipedia is a strong example of wiki collaboration and stands tall as a beacon.
Its success and sustainability are far more important to students, academicians and knowledge seekers of the world than to the volunteer professionals who regularly edit and contribute content.
Though Wikipedia in the recent past has suffered from a lack of young contributors, it is still doing fine.
There is no centralized control. No restriction. Anybody can contribute. The Wikipedia foundation is a non-profit organization and yet the volunteers contribute on their own free will. A commendable sense of community spirit. They are a set of passionate folks. They do it for the ‘Love of the WWW (World wide web).
There is a lot to learn from Wikipedia as a channel for wiki collaboration. Though Wikipedia has been so popular, it is not been seen as social media tool by many. Perhaps, the founders and volunteers need to shape it up in such a way so as to encourage a lot of public contribution.
Best practices for Wiki collaboration
There has been no alternative to Wikipedia so far, as a Wiki collaboration tool. It is online collaboration at its best.
A good characteristic which distinguishes itself from others is the concept of NPOV (Neutral point of view). Wikipedia depends on its volunteers to update and contribute information. The final information that is presented to the user is neutral in nature.
Volunteers update information from various sources. Some may agree and some may not agree on the information presented. The contentions and disputes among volunteers on information sources and claims are quickly resolved. What finally is presented is the information on a topic or subject matter from a neutral point of view (NPOV). A good best practice, that even today there are many regulations on information management and databases that are derived from it.
Another important practice that Wikipedia does is to weed out vandalized information on a continuous basis. Online Wiki collaboration has its bane as well. Anything good information found on the internet which is free and easy to edit and collaborate is also prone to information being vandalized. The volunteer editors at Wikipedia have a very tight network where they immediately discard unwanted information in a matter of minutes.
You can also read our article: The age of social media- How participation makes it a way of life.
The LA Times Example
Many other publications had tried to emulate the success of Wikipedia. One such example which is worth mentioning is “LA Times”. LA times introduced ‘Wikitorials’ which was shortlived. They introduced it with the intent that the public would edit and collaborate with each other to work on their editorial page. But with the absence of dedication and commitment from the administrators and volunteers, the site was quickly vandalized by some elements in the public. They had to shut it down.
So, it was the sheer dedication and the spirit of community among the Wikipedia volunteers that led to its success. Maintaining such a comprehensive repository of information and knowledge on the public domain is no mean challenge for Wiki collaboration.
There was harmony among the volunteers to produce content which was acceptable to everyone. It was done for the ‘love of the World Wide Web’.
Off-late some pitfalls
Wikipedia was at its peak in 2005 and it its English language version was the most visited reference site in the world. Andrew Lih in his New York times article talks about the staff crunch that Wikipedia faces.
It was said that they had about 60 editors who were allocated for admin roles in a month. Now, it is hard to allocate even one editor in a month.
The number of volunteers who contribute new information is dwindling. There is a dearth of young contributors, who have the potential and zest to write about topics, agrees Tim Simonite from MIT Technology review.
Obviously, there seems to be a generational gap within the old timers who stick to the traditional approach for updating information and are unwilling to change. Wiki collaboration has to change with the time. The newcomers and the younger generation want information to be updated on the new mobile computing infrastructure. There is a learning curve attached as well. These governance issues need to be sorted out.
The Wikipedia foundation which runs the administration and infrastructure portions have plans to bring in new software and editing capabilities, to steer the way the Wiki collaboration happens among the volunteers.
It is time now that Wikipedia is used by its users as a social media tool as well. Just like how Facebook serves as an entertainment social media. Wikipedia should place itself as a ‘knowledge social media’. Though I have been hearing talks, I haven’t seen any ‘share’ or ‘thank’ buttons incorporated yet.
The Final word
Wikipedia will succeed and overcome its challenges. It is a matter of time. There is now enough impetus with the introduction of Wikitribune. As a Wiki collaboration software, Wikipedia offers us many lessons to learn not just about how Wiki collaboration should function and work but on the remarkable spirit of community and for the power of free expression.
A further reading resource is from The Guardian.